A dynamic tradition of truth-telling: Moral innovation in the Mahābhārata

Jonardon Ganeri

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The Idea of a Dynamic Tradition The kernel of the idea of tradition consists in the idea of a practice whose present performance is causally explained by the fact of its having been performed in the past. Traditions instantiate the scheme ‘X is done because X has been done’, where the ‘because’ stands for a relation of causal explanation (the ‘because’ as is found in statements such as ‘the river is swollen because it rained’). The term ‘practice’ in this definition is of broad extention, referring to any species of intentional human activity, and including all but not only the following: matters of personal, familial and social custom, ritual activity, assent to particular and systematic doctrine, the transmission of apprenticeship, skills and training, research programmes and methodologies of inquiry, valuational practices and the cultivation of particular virtues. A tradition is a practice whose later stages are causally self-explained by its earlier stages. We should note that the idea of causal self-explanation is consistent with the existence of external causal factors acting on the tradition, just as citing the rain as the causal explanation of the river's being swollen does not preclude the existence of other causal factors, such as the soil being dry. Causal explanation involves the selection, from among the totality of causes, one that is especially salient or relevant (and in that sense, explanatory). There is no implication, then, that traditions are insulated, self-sufficient, or immune to external causal influence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationBoundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia
PublisherAnthem Press
Pages175-202
Number of pages28
ISBN (Electronic)9781843313977
ISBN (Print)0857284304, 9780857284303
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Innovation
Truth-telling
Causal
Causal Explanation
Kernel
Apprenticeship
Familial
Assent
Causes
Totality
Doctrine
Soil
Research Program
Self-explanation
Salient
Social Custom
Rivers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Ganeri, J. (2011). A dynamic tradition of truth-telling: Moral innovation in the Mahābhārata. In Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia (pp. 175-202). Anthem Press. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843313977.009

A dynamic tradition of truth-telling : Moral innovation in the Mahābhārata. / Ganeri, Jonardon.

Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia. Anthem Press, 2011. p. 175-202.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Ganeri, J 2011, A dynamic tradition of truth-telling: Moral innovation in the Mahābhārata. in Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia. Anthem Press, pp. 175-202. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843313977.009
Ganeri J. A dynamic tradition of truth-telling: Moral innovation in the Mahābhārata. In Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia. Anthem Press. 2011. p. 175-202 https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843313977.009
Ganeri, Jonardon. / A dynamic tradition of truth-telling : Moral innovation in the Mahābhārata. Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia. Anthem Press, 2011. pp. 175-202
@inbook{d506586ed00b4ced9b643780adb1d72a,
title = "A dynamic tradition of truth-telling: Moral innovation in the Mahābhārata",
abstract = "The Idea of a Dynamic Tradition The kernel of the idea of tradition consists in the idea of a practice whose present performance is causally explained by the fact of its having been performed in the past. Traditions instantiate the scheme ‘X is done because X has been done’, where the ‘because’ stands for a relation of causal explanation (the ‘because’ as is found in statements such as ‘the river is swollen because it rained’). The term ‘practice’ in this definition is of broad extention, referring to any species of intentional human activity, and including all but not only the following: matters of personal, familial and social custom, ritual activity, assent to particular and systematic doctrine, the transmission of apprenticeship, skills and training, research programmes and methodologies of inquiry, valuational practices and the cultivation of particular virtues. A tradition is a practice whose later stages are causally self-explained by its earlier stages. We should note that the idea of causal self-explanation is consistent with the existence of external causal factors acting on the tradition, just as citing the rain as the causal explanation of the river's being swollen does not preclude the existence of other causal factors, such as the soil being dry. Causal explanation involves the selection, from among the totality of causes, one that is especially salient or relevant (and in that sense, explanatory). There is no implication, then, that traditions are insulated, self-sufficient, or immune to external causal influence.",
author = "Jonardon Ganeri",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7135/UPO9781843313977.009",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0857284304",
pages = "175--202",
booktitle = "Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia",
publisher = "Anthem Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A dynamic tradition of truth-telling

T2 - Moral innovation in the Mahābhārata

AU - Ganeri, Jonardon

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - The Idea of a Dynamic Tradition The kernel of the idea of tradition consists in the idea of a practice whose present performance is causally explained by the fact of its having been performed in the past. Traditions instantiate the scheme ‘X is done because X has been done’, where the ‘because’ stands for a relation of causal explanation (the ‘because’ as is found in statements such as ‘the river is swollen because it rained’). The term ‘practice’ in this definition is of broad extention, referring to any species of intentional human activity, and including all but not only the following: matters of personal, familial and social custom, ritual activity, assent to particular and systematic doctrine, the transmission of apprenticeship, skills and training, research programmes and methodologies of inquiry, valuational practices and the cultivation of particular virtues. A tradition is a practice whose later stages are causally self-explained by its earlier stages. We should note that the idea of causal self-explanation is consistent with the existence of external causal factors acting on the tradition, just as citing the rain as the causal explanation of the river's being swollen does not preclude the existence of other causal factors, such as the soil being dry. Causal explanation involves the selection, from among the totality of causes, one that is especially salient or relevant (and in that sense, explanatory). There is no implication, then, that traditions are insulated, self-sufficient, or immune to external causal influence.

AB - The Idea of a Dynamic Tradition The kernel of the idea of tradition consists in the idea of a practice whose present performance is causally explained by the fact of its having been performed in the past. Traditions instantiate the scheme ‘X is done because X has been done’, where the ‘because’ stands for a relation of causal explanation (the ‘because’ as is found in statements such as ‘the river is swollen because it rained’). The term ‘practice’ in this definition is of broad extention, referring to any species of intentional human activity, and including all but not only the following: matters of personal, familial and social custom, ritual activity, assent to particular and systematic doctrine, the transmission of apprenticeship, skills and training, research programmes and methodologies of inquiry, valuational practices and the cultivation of particular virtues. A tradition is a practice whose later stages are causally self-explained by its earlier stages. We should note that the idea of causal self-explanation is consistent with the existence of external causal factors acting on the tradition, just as citing the rain as the causal explanation of the river's being swollen does not preclude the existence of other causal factors, such as the soil being dry. Causal explanation involves the selection, from among the totality of causes, one that is especially salient or relevant (and in that sense, explanatory). There is no implication, then, that traditions are insulated, self-sufficient, or immune to external causal influence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903962077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903962077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7135/UPO9781843313977.009

DO - 10.7135/UPO9781843313977.009

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84903962077

SN - 0857284304

SN - 9780857284303

SP - 175

EP - 202

BT - Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia

PB - Anthem Press

ER -