A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task

Natasha Duell, Grace Icenogle, Karol Silva, Jason Chein, Laurence Steinberg, Marie T. Banich, Laura Di Guinta, Kenneth A. Dodge, Kostas A. Fanti, Jennifer E. Lansford, Paul Oburu, Concetta Pastorelli, Ann T. Skinner, Emma Sorbring, Sombat Tapanya, Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado, Liane Peña Alampay, Suha M. Al-Hassan, Hanan M.S. Takash, Dario BacchiniLei Chang, Nandita Chaudhary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors examined the association between working memory and response inhibition on the Stroop task using a cross-sectional, international sample of 5099 individuals (49.3% male) ages 10–30 (M = 17.04 years; SD = 5.9). Response inhibition was measured using a Stroop task that included “equal” and “unequal” blocks, during which the relative frequency of neutral and incongruent trials was manipulated. Competing stimuli in incongruent trials evinced inhibitory functioning, and having a lower proportion of incongruent trials (as in unequal blocks) placed higher demands on working memory. Results for accuracy indicated that age and working memory were independently associated with response inhibition. Age differences in response inhibition followed a curvilinear trajectory, with performance improving into early adulthood. Response inhibition was greatest among individuals with high working memory. For response time, age uniquely predicted response inhibition in unequal blocks. In equal blocks, age differences in response inhibition varied as a function of working memory, with age differences being least pronounced among individuals with high working memory. The implications of considering the association between response inhibition and working memory in the context of development are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-31
Number of pages13
JournalCognitive Development
Volume47
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Inhibition (Psychology)
Reaction Time

Keywords

  • Development
  • Response inhibition
  • Stroop
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Duell, N., Icenogle, G., Silva, K., Chein, J., Steinberg, L., Banich, M. T., ... Chaudhary, N. (2018). A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task. Cognitive Development, 47, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.02.003

A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task. / Duell, Natasha; Icenogle, Grace; Silva, Karol; Chein, Jason; Steinberg, Laurence; Banich, Marie T.; Di Guinta, Laura; Dodge, Kenneth A.; Fanti, Kostas A.; Lansford, Jennifer E.; Oburu, Paul; Pastorelli, Concetta; Skinner, Ann T.; Sorbring, Emma; Tapanya, Sombat; Uribe Tirado, Liliana Maria; Alampay, Liane Peña; Al-Hassan, Suha M.; Takash, Hanan M.S.; Bacchini, Dario; Chang, Lei; Chaudhary, Nandita.

In: Cognitive Development, Vol. 47, 01.07.2018, p. 19-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duell, N, Icenogle, G, Silva, K, Chein, J, Steinberg, L, Banich, MT, Di Guinta, L, Dodge, KA, Fanti, KA, Lansford, JE, Oburu, P, Pastorelli, C, Skinner, AT, Sorbring, E, Tapanya, S, Uribe Tirado, LM, Alampay, LP, Al-Hassan, SM, Takash, HMS, Bacchini, D, Chang, L & Chaudhary, N 2018, 'A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task', Cognitive Development, vol. 47, pp. 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.02.003
Duell, Natasha ; Icenogle, Grace ; Silva, Karol ; Chein, Jason ; Steinberg, Laurence ; Banich, Marie T. ; Di Guinta, Laura ; Dodge, Kenneth A. ; Fanti, Kostas A. ; Lansford, Jennifer E. ; Oburu, Paul ; Pastorelli, Concetta ; Skinner, Ann T. ; Sorbring, Emma ; Tapanya, Sombat ; Uribe Tirado, Liliana Maria ; Alampay, Liane Peña ; Al-Hassan, Suha M. ; Takash, Hanan M.S. ; Bacchini, Dario ; Chang, Lei ; Chaudhary, Nandita. / A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task. In: Cognitive Development. 2018 ; Vol. 47. pp. 19-31.
@article{55e8dd741fc24ad89d0099227a45dce9,
title = "A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task",
abstract = "The authors examined the association between working memory and response inhibition on the Stroop task using a cross-sectional, international sample of 5099 individuals (49.3{\%} male) ages 10–30 (M = 17.04 years; SD = 5.9). Response inhibition was measured using a Stroop task that included “equal” and “unequal” blocks, during which the relative frequency of neutral and incongruent trials was manipulated. Competing stimuli in incongruent trials evinced inhibitory functioning, and having a lower proportion of incongruent trials (as in unequal blocks) placed higher demands on working memory. Results for accuracy indicated that age and working memory were independently associated with response inhibition. Age differences in response inhibition followed a curvilinear trajectory, with performance improving into early adulthood. Response inhibition was greatest among individuals with high working memory. For response time, age uniquely predicted response inhibition in unequal blocks. In equal blocks, age differences in response inhibition varied as a function of working memory, with age differences being least pronounced among individuals with high working memory. The implications of considering the association between response inhibition and working memory in the context of development are discussed.",
keywords = "Development, Response inhibition, Stroop, Working memory",
author = "Natasha Duell and Grace Icenogle and Karol Silva and Jason Chein and Laurence Steinberg and Banich, {Marie T.} and {Di Guinta}, Laura and Dodge, {Kenneth A.} and Fanti, {Kostas A.} and Lansford, {Jennifer E.} and Paul Oburu and Concetta Pastorelli and Skinner, {Ann T.} and Emma Sorbring and Sombat Tapanya and {Uribe Tirado}, {Liliana Maria} and Alampay, {Liane Pe{\~n}a} and Al-Hassan, {Suha M.} and Takash, {Hanan M.S.} and Dario Bacchini and Lei Chang and Nandita Chaudhary",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.02.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "19--31",
journal = "Cognitive Development",
issn = "0885-2014",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task

AU - Duell, Natasha

AU - Icenogle, Grace

AU - Silva, Karol

AU - Chein, Jason

AU - Steinberg, Laurence

AU - Banich, Marie T.

AU - Di Guinta, Laura

AU - Dodge, Kenneth A.

AU - Fanti, Kostas A.

AU - Lansford, Jennifer E.

AU - Oburu, Paul

AU - Pastorelli, Concetta

AU - Skinner, Ann T.

AU - Sorbring, Emma

AU - Tapanya, Sombat

AU - Uribe Tirado, Liliana Maria

AU - Alampay, Liane Peña

AU - Al-Hassan, Suha M.

AU - Takash, Hanan M.S.

AU - Bacchini, Dario

AU - Chang, Lei

AU - Chaudhary, Nandita

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - The authors examined the association between working memory and response inhibition on the Stroop task using a cross-sectional, international sample of 5099 individuals (49.3% male) ages 10–30 (M = 17.04 years; SD = 5.9). Response inhibition was measured using a Stroop task that included “equal” and “unequal” blocks, during which the relative frequency of neutral and incongruent trials was manipulated. Competing stimuli in incongruent trials evinced inhibitory functioning, and having a lower proportion of incongruent trials (as in unequal blocks) placed higher demands on working memory. Results for accuracy indicated that age and working memory were independently associated with response inhibition. Age differences in response inhibition followed a curvilinear trajectory, with performance improving into early adulthood. Response inhibition was greatest among individuals with high working memory. For response time, age uniquely predicted response inhibition in unequal blocks. In equal blocks, age differences in response inhibition varied as a function of working memory, with age differences being least pronounced among individuals with high working memory. The implications of considering the association between response inhibition and working memory in the context of development are discussed.

AB - The authors examined the association between working memory and response inhibition on the Stroop task using a cross-sectional, international sample of 5099 individuals (49.3% male) ages 10–30 (M = 17.04 years; SD = 5.9). Response inhibition was measured using a Stroop task that included “equal” and “unequal” blocks, during which the relative frequency of neutral and incongruent trials was manipulated. Competing stimuli in incongruent trials evinced inhibitory functioning, and having a lower proportion of incongruent trials (as in unequal blocks) placed higher demands on working memory. Results for accuracy indicated that age and working memory were independently associated with response inhibition. Age differences in response inhibition followed a curvilinear trajectory, with performance improving into early adulthood. Response inhibition was greatest among individuals with high working memory. For response time, age uniquely predicted response inhibition in unequal blocks. In equal blocks, age differences in response inhibition varied as a function of working memory, with age differences being least pronounced among individuals with high working memory. The implications of considering the association between response inhibition and working memory in the context of development are discussed.

KW - Development

KW - Response inhibition

KW - Stroop

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042715504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042715504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.02.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042715504

VL - 47

SP - 19

EP - 31

JO - Cognitive Development

JF - Cognitive Development

SN - 0885-2014

ER -