A Critical Perspective on Mechanical Testing of Implants and Prostheses

E. A. Bonfante, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The degree of interplay among variables in dental implant treatment presents a challenge to randomized clinical trials attempting to answer questions in a timely, unbiased, and economically feasible fashion. Further adding complexity to the different scenarios is the varied implant designs and related bone response, area of implantation, implant bulk material, restoration, abutments and related screws, fixation mode (screwed, fixed, or a combination), and horizontal implant-abutment matching geometry. This article critically appraises the most common mechanical testing methods used to characterize the implant-prostheses complex. It attempts to provide insight into the process of construction of an informed database of clinically relevant questions regarding preclinical evaluation of implant biomechanics and failure mechanisms. The use of single load to failure, fatigue life, fatigue limit, and step-stress accelerated life testing is discussed with emphasis on their deliverables, weaknesses, and strengths. Fractographic analysis and challenges in the correlation between laboratory- and in-service-produced failures of dental ceramics, resin composites, and titanium are introduced. In addition, examples are presented of mechanical characterization studies used in our laboratory to assess some implant-supported rehabilitation variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)18-27
Number of pages10
JournalAdvances in dental research
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Prostheses and Implants
Fatigue
Dental Implants
Ceramics
Titanium
Psychological Stress
Biomechanical Phenomena
Rehabilitation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Databases
Bone and Bones
Therapeutics
Composite Dental Resin

Keywords

  • ceramics
  • fatigue
  • fractures
  • in vitro techniques
  • methods
  • titanium

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A Critical Perspective on Mechanical Testing of Implants and Prostheses. / Bonfante, E. A.; Coelho, Paulo.

In: Advances in dental research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 18-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{dac8e3bd1e3e415ea129f0ee14964696,
title = "A Critical Perspective on Mechanical Testing of Implants and Prostheses",
abstract = "The degree of interplay among variables in dental implant treatment presents a challenge to randomized clinical trials attempting to answer questions in a timely, unbiased, and economically feasible fashion. Further adding complexity to the different scenarios is the varied implant designs and related bone response, area of implantation, implant bulk material, restoration, abutments and related screws, fixation mode (screwed, fixed, or a combination), and horizontal implant-abutment matching geometry. This article critically appraises the most common mechanical testing methods used to characterize the implant-prostheses complex. It attempts to provide insight into the process of construction of an informed database of clinically relevant questions regarding preclinical evaluation of implant biomechanics and failure mechanisms. The use of single load to failure, fatigue life, fatigue limit, and step-stress accelerated life testing is discussed with emphasis on their deliverables, weaknesses, and strengths. Fractographic analysis and challenges in the correlation between laboratory- and in-service-produced failures of dental ceramics, resin composites, and titanium are introduced. In addition, examples are presented of mechanical characterization studies used in our laboratory to assess some implant-supported rehabilitation variables.",
keywords = "ceramics, fatigue, fractures, in vitro techniques, methods, titanium",
author = "Bonfante, {E. A.} and Paulo Coelho",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022034515624445",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "18--27",
journal = "Advances in dental research",
issn = "0895-9374",
publisher = "International Association for Dental Research",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Critical Perspective on Mechanical Testing of Implants and Prostheses

AU - Bonfante, E. A.

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - The degree of interplay among variables in dental implant treatment presents a challenge to randomized clinical trials attempting to answer questions in a timely, unbiased, and economically feasible fashion. Further adding complexity to the different scenarios is the varied implant designs and related bone response, area of implantation, implant bulk material, restoration, abutments and related screws, fixation mode (screwed, fixed, or a combination), and horizontal implant-abutment matching geometry. This article critically appraises the most common mechanical testing methods used to characterize the implant-prostheses complex. It attempts to provide insight into the process of construction of an informed database of clinically relevant questions regarding preclinical evaluation of implant biomechanics and failure mechanisms. The use of single load to failure, fatigue life, fatigue limit, and step-stress accelerated life testing is discussed with emphasis on their deliverables, weaknesses, and strengths. Fractographic analysis and challenges in the correlation between laboratory- and in-service-produced failures of dental ceramics, resin composites, and titanium are introduced. In addition, examples are presented of mechanical characterization studies used in our laboratory to assess some implant-supported rehabilitation variables.

AB - The degree of interplay among variables in dental implant treatment presents a challenge to randomized clinical trials attempting to answer questions in a timely, unbiased, and economically feasible fashion. Further adding complexity to the different scenarios is the varied implant designs and related bone response, area of implantation, implant bulk material, restoration, abutments and related screws, fixation mode (screwed, fixed, or a combination), and horizontal implant-abutment matching geometry. This article critically appraises the most common mechanical testing methods used to characterize the implant-prostheses complex. It attempts to provide insight into the process of construction of an informed database of clinically relevant questions regarding preclinical evaluation of implant biomechanics and failure mechanisms. The use of single load to failure, fatigue life, fatigue limit, and step-stress accelerated life testing is discussed with emphasis on their deliverables, weaknesses, and strengths. Fractographic analysis and challenges in the correlation between laboratory- and in-service-produced failures of dental ceramics, resin composites, and titanium are introduced. In addition, examples are presented of mechanical characterization studies used in our laboratory to assess some implant-supported rehabilitation variables.

KW - ceramics

KW - fatigue

KW - fractures

KW - in vitro techniques

KW - methods

KW - titanium

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016409787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016409787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022034515624445

DO - 10.1177/0022034515624445

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26927484

AN - SCOPUS:85016409787

VL - 28

SP - 18

EP - 27

JO - Advances in dental research

JF - Advances in dental research

SN - 0895-9374

IS - 1

ER -