A connectionist model of spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference

Do they have the same underlying processes?

Diana Orghian, Leonel Garcia-Marques, James Uleman, Dietmar Heinke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Spontaneous trait inference (STI) and trait transference (STT) refer to the inference of personality traits from behaviors. In STI the inferred trait is attached to the actor, and in STT it is attached to a communicator. Two different explanations are currently discussed in the literature regarding their underlying processes. One claims that a single associative process is responsible for both, and the second postulates an associative process for STT and an attributional process for STI. Here we propose that a dual-processing model is not necessary to account for the empirical data regarding STI and STT. Through a simple connectionist model, based on associative learning, we simulated the four major findings that distinguish STI from STT. Suggestions are made about what kind of evidence would be necessary to consider a dualistic view, and a broader use of this approach applied to dualistic versus single processing disputes is also discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)20-66
Number of pages47
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume33
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Neural Networks (Computer)
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Dissent and Disputes
Personality
Transference (Psychology)
Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

A connectionist model of spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference : Do they have the same underlying processes? / Orghian, Diana; Garcia-Marques, Leonel; Uleman, James; Heinke, Dietmar.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2015, p. 20-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Orghian, Diana ; Garcia-Marques, Leonel ; Uleman, James ; Heinke, Dietmar. / A connectionist model of spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference : Do they have the same underlying processes?. In: Social Cognition. 2015 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 20-66.
@article{8d345ed483e74862a252cbb8248e2ef1,
title = "A connectionist model of spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference: Do they have the same underlying processes?",
abstract = "Spontaneous trait inference (STI) and trait transference (STT) refer to the inference of personality traits from behaviors. In STI the inferred trait is attached to the actor, and in STT it is attached to a communicator. Two different explanations are currently discussed in the literature regarding their underlying processes. One claims that a single associative process is responsible for both, and the second postulates an associative process for STT and an attributional process for STI. Here we propose that a dual-processing model is not necessary to account for the empirical data regarding STI and STT. Through a simple connectionist model, based on associative learning, we simulated the four major findings that distinguish STI from STT. Suggestions are made about what kind of evidence would be necessary to consider a dualistic view, and a broader use of this approach applied to dualistic versus single processing disputes is also discussed.",
author = "Diana Orghian and Leonel Garcia-Marques and James Uleman and Dietmar Heinke",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "20--66",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A connectionist model of spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference

T2 - Do they have the same underlying processes?

AU - Orghian, Diana

AU - Garcia-Marques, Leonel

AU - Uleman, James

AU - Heinke, Dietmar

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Spontaneous trait inference (STI) and trait transference (STT) refer to the inference of personality traits from behaviors. In STI the inferred trait is attached to the actor, and in STT it is attached to a communicator. Two different explanations are currently discussed in the literature regarding their underlying processes. One claims that a single associative process is responsible for both, and the second postulates an associative process for STT and an attributional process for STI. Here we propose that a dual-processing model is not necessary to account for the empirical data regarding STI and STT. Through a simple connectionist model, based on associative learning, we simulated the four major findings that distinguish STI from STT. Suggestions are made about what kind of evidence would be necessary to consider a dualistic view, and a broader use of this approach applied to dualistic versus single processing disputes is also discussed.

AB - Spontaneous trait inference (STI) and trait transference (STT) refer to the inference of personality traits from behaviors. In STI the inferred trait is attached to the actor, and in STT it is attached to a communicator. Two different explanations are currently discussed in the literature regarding their underlying processes. One claims that a single associative process is responsible for both, and the second postulates an associative process for STT and an attributional process for STI. Here we propose that a dual-processing model is not necessary to account for the empirical data regarding STI and STT. Through a simple connectionist model, based on associative learning, we simulated the four major findings that distinguish STI from STT. Suggestions are made about what kind of evidence would be necessary to consider a dualistic view, and a broader use of this approach applied to dualistic versus single processing disputes is also discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923819650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923819650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 20

EP - 66

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 1

ER -