A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States

Mamta Mehra, Farhad Vahidi, Robert W. Berg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to survey program directors of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States regarding their programs' complete denture impression techniques. The key objectives of the survey were to identify the current trends in complete denture impression making and to determine which techniques and materials are taught in US postdoctoral prosthodontic programs. Materials and Methods: An online survey was sent to all program directors of US postdoctoral prosthodontic programs. The survey comprised two sections: preliminary impressions and final impressions. The survey contained 22 questions that would take approximately 5 minutes to complete. All responses remained anonymous throughout the survey. Results: The response rate for the survey was 87%. A majority of the programs did not separately border mold the tray prior to making the preliminary impressions (82%). The impression material of choice for the preliminary impression was irreversible hydrocolloid (88%). Selective pressure was the predominantly used impression philosophy (80%). All programs border molded the custom tray, and 95% recorded the borders in sections. The material of choice for border molding the custom tray was modeling plastic impression compound (71%). The most commonly used impression material for the final impressions was polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) (42%), and the second most commonly used impression material was polysulphide (32%). The most common technique for locating the posterior palatal seal was marking intraorally and transferring onto the final impression (65%). Most programs routinely advised their patients not to wear their existing dentures for at least 24 hours before the final impressions were made (83%). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) The most commonly used material for the preliminary impression was irreversible hydrocolloid and for the final impression was PVS. (2) Modeling plastic impression compound was used by most programs to border mold the custom trays. (3) Selective pressure was the predominantly used impression philosophy. (4) A majority of the programs made a special consideration for excessive movable (flabby) tissue. (5) Most programs routinely advised their patients to not wear their existing dentures for at least 24 hours before the final impressions were made.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-327
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Prosthodontics
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Complete Denture
Prosthodontics
Dentures
Colloids
Plastics
Fungi
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Curriculum survey
  • Postgraduate
  • Removable prosthodontics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States. / Mehra, Mamta; Vahidi, Farhad; Berg, Robert W.

In: Journal of Prosthodontics, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2014, p. 320-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb84ed2d7d1c4db7a08fa588265d23e7,
title = "A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of the study was to survey program directors of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States regarding their programs' complete denture impression techniques. The key objectives of the survey were to identify the current trends in complete denture impression making and to determine which techniques and materials are taught in US postdoctoral prosthodontic programs. Materials and Methods: An online survey was sent to all program directors of US postdoctoral prosthodontic programs. The survey comprised two sections: preliminary impressions and final impressions. The survey contained 22 questions that would take approximately 5 minutes to complete. All responses remained anonymous throughout the survey. Results: The response rate for the survey was 87{\%}. A majority of the programs did not separately border mold the tray prior to making the preliminary impressions (82{\%}). The impression material of choice for the preliminary impression was irreversible hydrocolloid (88{\%}). Selective pressure was the predominantly used impression philosophy (80{\%}). All programs border molded the custom tray, and 95{\%} recorded the borders in sections. The material of choice for border molding the custom tray was modeling plastic impression compound (71{\%}). The most commonly used impression material for the final impressions was polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) (42{\%}), and the second most commonly used impression material was polysulphide (32{\%}). The most common technique for locating the posterior palatal seal was marking intraorally and transferring onto the final impression (65{\%}). Most programs routinely advised their patients not to wear their existing dentures for at least 24 hours before the final impressions were made (83{\%}). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) The most commonly used material for the preliminary impression was irreversible hydrocolloid and for the final impression was PVS. (2) Modeling plastic impression compound was used by most programs to border mold the custom trays. (3) Selective pressure was the predominantly used impression philosophy. (4) A majority of the programs made a special consideration for excessive movable (flabby) tissue. (5) Most programs routinely advised their patients to not wear their existing dentures for at least 24 hours before the final impressions were made.",
keywords = "Curriculum survey, Postgraduate, Removable prosthodontics",
author = "Mamta Mehra and Farhad Vahidi and Berg, {Robert W.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/jopr.12099",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "320--327",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "1059-941X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States

AU - Mehra, Mamta

AU - Vahidi, Farhad

AU - Berg, Robert W.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of the study was to survey program directors of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States regarding their programs' complete denture impression techniques. The key objectives of the survey were to identify the current trends in complete denture impression making and to determine which techniques and materials are taught in US postdoctoral prosthodontic programs. Materials and Methods: An online survey was sent to all program directors of US postdoctoral prosthodontic programs. The survey comprised two sections: preliminary impressions and final impressions. The survey contained 22 questions that would take approximately 5 minutes to complete. All responses remained anonymous throughout the survey. Results: The response rate for the survey was 87%. A majority of the programs did not separately border mold the tray prior to making the preliminary impressions (82%). The impression material of choice for the preliminary impression was irreversible hydrocolloid (88%). Selective pressure was the predominantly used impression philosophy (80%). All programs border molded the custom tray, and 95% recorded the borders in sections. The material of choice for border molding the custom tray was modeling plastic impression compound (71%). The most commonly used impression material for the final impressions was polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) (42%), and the second most commonly used impression material was polysulphide (32%). The most common technique for locating the posterior palatal seal was marking intraorally and transferring onto the final impression (65%). Most programs routinely advised their patients not to wear their existing dentures for at least 24 hours before the final impressions were made (83%). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) The most commonly used material for the preliminary impression was irreversible hydrocolloid and for the final impression was PVS. (2) Modeling plastic impression compound was used by most programs to border mold the custom trays. (3) Selective pressure was the predominantly used impression philosophy. (4) A majority of the programs made a special consideration for excessive movable (flabby) tissue. (5) Most programs routinely advised their patients to not wear their existing dentures for at least 24 hours before the final impressions were made.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of the study was to survey program directors of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States regarding their programs' complete denture impression techniques. The key objectives of the survey were to identify the current trends in complete denture impression making and to determine which techniques and materials are taught in US postdoctoral prosthodontic programs. Materials and Methods: An online survey was sent to all program directors of US postdoctoral prosthodontic programs. The survey comprised two sections: preliminary impressions and final impressions. The survey contained 22 questions that would take approximately 5 minutes to complete. All responses remained anonymous throughout the survey. Results: The response rate for the survey was 87%. A majority of the programs did not separately border mold the tray prior to making the preliminary impressions (82%). The impression material of choice for the preliminary impression was irreversible hydrocolloid (88%). Selective pressure was the predominantly used impression philosophy (80%). All programs border molded the custom tray, and 95% recorded the borders in sections. The material of choice for border molding the custom tray was modeling plastic impression compound (71%). The most commonly used impression material for the final impressions was polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) (42%), and the second most commonly used impression material was polysulphide (32%). The most common technique for locating the posterior palatal seal was marking intraorally and transferring onto the final impression (65%). Most programs routinely advised their patients not to wear their existing dentures for at least 24 hours before the final impressions were made (83%). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) The most commonly used material for the preliminary impression was irreversible hydrocolloid and for the final impression was PVS. (2) Modeling plastic impression compound was used by most programs to border mold the custom trays. (3) Selective pressure was the predominantly used impression philosophy. (4) A majority of the programs made a special consideration for excessive movable (flabby) tissue. (5) Most programs routinely advised their patients to not wear their existing dentures for at least 24 hours before the final impressions were made.

KW - Curriculum survey

KW - Postgraduate

KW - Removable prosthodontics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902536660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902536660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jopr.12099

DO - 10.1111/jopr.12099

M3 - Article

C2 - 24118134

AN - SCOPUS:84902536660

VL - 23

SP - 320

EP - 327

JO - Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 1059-941X

IS - 4

ER -