A comparison of spousal aggression prevalence rates in U.S. Army and civilian representative samples

Richard E. Heyman, Peter H. Neidig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study compared prevalence rates from reasonably representatives U.S. Army (N = 33,762) and civilian (N = 3,044) samples. Age and race were controlled by weighting each sample to 1990 U.S. Census characteristics for married, full-time employed persons. Men's reports of moderate husband-to- wife spousal aggression were not significantly higher, but reports of severe aggression were significantly higher in the standardized Army sample than in the comparable civilian sample (adjusted rates of 2.5% vs. 0.7%, respectively). Thus, controlling for age and race results in reasonably similar prevalence rates. Future studies that more carefully control for any background differences in military and civilian respondents could discern whether military service adds any increased risk for partner violence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)239-242
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume67
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Aggression
Spouses
Censuses
Violence
Cross-Sectional Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

A comparison of spousal aggression prevalence rates in U.S. Army and civilian representative samples. / Heyman, Richard E.; Neidig, Peter H.

In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 2, 1999, p. 239-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eda500653ce646ed843f6f4f91da0bec,
title = "A comparison of spousal aggression prevalence rates in U.S. Army and civilian representative samples",
abstract = "This study compared prevalence rates from reasonably representatives U.S. Army (N = 33,762) and civilian (N = 3,044) samples. Age and race were controlled by weighting each sample to 1990 U.S. Census characteristics for married, full-time employed persons. Men's reports of moderate husband-to- wife spousal aggression were not significantly higher, but reports of severe aggression were significantly higher in the standardized Army sample than in the comparable civilian sample (adjusted rates of 2.5{\%} vs. 0.7{\%}, respectively). Thus, controlling for age and race results in reasonably similar prevalence rates. Future studies that more carefully control for any background differences in military and civilian respondents could discern whether military service adds any increased risk for partner violence.",
author = "Heyman, {Richard E.} and Neidig, {Peter H.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.239",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "239--242",
journal = "Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0022-006X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of spousal aggression prevalence rates in U.S. Army and civilian representative samples

AU - Heyman, Richard E.

AU - Neidig, Peter H.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This study compared prevalence rates from reasonably representatives U.S. Army (N = 33,762) and civilian (N = 3,044) samples. Age and race were controlled by weighting each sample to 1990 U.S. Census characteristics for married, full-time employed persons. Men's reports of moderate husband-to- wife spousal aggression were not significantly higher, but reports of severe aggression were significantly higher in the standardized Army sample than in the comparable civilian sample (adjusted rates of 2.5% vs. 0.7%, respectively). Thus, controlling for age and race results in reasonably similar prevalence rates. Future studies that more carefully control for any background differences in military and civilian respondents could discern whether military service adds any increased risk for partner violence.

AB - This study compared prevalence rates from reasonably representatives U.S. Army (N = 33,762) and civilian (N = 3,044) samples. Age and race were controlled by weighting each sample to 1990 U.S. Census characteristics for married, full-time employed persons. Men's reports of moderate husband-to- wife spousal aggression were not significantly higher, but reports of severe aggression were significantly higher in the standardized Army sample than in the comparable civilian sample (adjusted rates of 2.5% vs. 0.7%, respectively). Thus, controlling for age and race results in reasonably similar prevalence rates. Future studies that more carefully control for any background differences in military and civilian respondents could discern whether military service adds any increased risk for partner violence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032967547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032967547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.239

DO - 10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.239

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 239

EP - 242

JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 2

ER -