A comparison of intra-arterial and auscultatory blood pressure readings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although fairly large individual discrepancies were noted between the systolic and diastolic readings obtained through intra-arterial and auscultatory methods, the mean differences in these readings were not found to be significant. In agreement with AHA standards, the disappearance of sound was found to be a better indicator of intra-arterial diastolic pressure than was muffling. The only hemodynamic variable that had a significant relationship (p < 0.001) with the discrepancy in diastolic readings was heart rate. The level of systolic and diastolic pressure readings, pulse pressure, and PVR varied minimally in this sample. Extremely high and low values were present when these parameters were correlated with discrepancies in other studies. While CO/CI and SV were depressed in most of the sample, in this limited number of subjects, these parameters alone, were not found to be associated with a discrepancy. The findings of this study suggest the following implications for clinical practice and further research: 1. Cuff size needs to be individualized for each patient. 2. Palpatory readings should be obtained before auscultation. 3. A way to determine the frequency response and damping coefficient should be available and used when comparing intra-arterial and auscultatory readings. 4. Simultaneous auscultatory and intra-arterial pressures should be taken in the same arm when assessing any discrepancy. In addition, auscultatory and palpatory, brachial and forearm pressures should be compared with an intra-arterial reading. Measurements of brachial and radial blood flow in the forearm would be useful in seeking to explain a discrepancy between measurement methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-227
Number of pages5
JournalHeart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care
Volume14
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1985

Fingerprint

Reading
Arterial Pressure
Blood Pressure
Arm
Forearm
Auscultation
Carbon Monoxide
Heart Rate
Hemodynamics
Pressure
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

A comparison of intra-arterial and auscultatory blood pressure readings. / Chyun, Deborah.

In: Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1985, p. 223-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{378dc17a54934a2fb6cb1044c7564233,
title = "A comparison of intra-arterial and auscultatory blood pressure readings",
abstract = "Although fairly large individual discrepancies were noted between the systolic and diastolic readings obtained through intra-arterial and auscultatory methods, the mean differences in these readings were not found to be significant. In agreement with AHA standards, the disappearance of sound was found to be a better indicator of intra-arterial diastolic pressure than was muffling. The only hemodynamic variable that had a significant relationship (p < 0.001) with the discrepancy in diastolic readings was heart rate. The level of systolic and diastolic pressure readings, pulse pressure, and PVR varied minimally in this sample. Extremely high and low values were present when these parameters were correlated with discrepancies in other studies. While CO/CI and SV were depressed in most of the sample, in this limited number of subjects, these parameters alone, were not found to be associated with a discrepancy. The findings of this study suggest the following implications for clinical practice and further research: 1. Cuff size needs to be individualized for each patient. 2. Palpatory readings should be obtained before auscultation. 3. A way to determine the frequency response and damping coefficient should be available and used when comparing intra-arterial and auscultatory readings. 4. Simultaneous auscultatory and intra-arterial pressures should be taken in the same arm when assessing any discrepancy. In addition, auscultatory and palpatory, brachial and forearm pressures should be compared with an intra-arterial reading. Measurements of brachial and radial blood flow in the forearm would be useful in seeking to explain a discrepancy between measurement methods.",
author = "Deborah Chyun",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "223--227",
journal = "Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care",
issn = "0147-9563",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of intra-arterial and auscultatory blood pressure readings

AU - Chyun, Deborah

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Although fairly large individual discrepancies were noted between the systolic and diastolic readings obtained through intra-arterial and auscultatory methods, the mean differences in these readings were not found to be significant. In agreement with AHA standards, the disappearance of sound was found to be a better indicator of intra-arterial diastolic pressure than was muffling. The only hemodynamic variable that had a significant relationship (p < 0.001) with the discrepancy in diastolic readings was heart rate. The level of systolic and diastolic pressure readings, pulse pressure, and PVR varied minimally in this sample. Extremely high and low values were present when these parameters were correlated with discrepancies in other studies. While CO/CI and SV were depressed in most of the sample, in this limited number of subjects, these parameters alone, were not found to be associated with a discrepancy. The findings of this study suggest the following implications for clinical practice and further research: 1. Cuff size needs to be individualized for each patient. 2. Palpatory readings should be obtained before auscultation. 3. A way to determine the frequency response and damping coefficient should be available and used when comparing intra-arterial and auscultatory readings. 4. Simultaneous auscultatory and intra-arterial pressures should be taken in the same arm when assessing any discrepancy. In addition, auscultatory and palpatory, brachial and forearm pressures should be compared with an intra-arterial reading. Measurements of brachial and radial blood flow in the forearm would be useful in seeking to explain a discrepancy between measurement methods.

AB - Although fairly large individual discrepancies were noted between the systolic and diastolic readings obtained through intra-arterial and auscultatory methods, the mean differences in these readings were not found to be significant. In agreement with AHA standards, the disappearance of sound was found to be a better indicator of intra-arterial diastolic pressure than was muffling. The only hemodynamic variable that had a significant relationship (p < 0.001) with the discrepancy in diastolic readings was heart rate. The level of systolic and diastolic pressure readings, pulse pressure, and PVR varied minimally in this sample. Extremely high and low values were present when these parameters were correlated with discrepancies in other studies. While CO/CI and SV were depressed in most of the sample, in this limited number of subjects, these parameters alone, were not found to be associated with a discrepancy. The findings of this study suggest the following implications for clinical practice and further research: 1. Cuff size needs to be individualized for each patient. 2. Palpatory readings should be obtained before auscultation. 3. A way to determine the frequency response and damping coefficient should be available and used when comparing intra-arterial and auscultatory readings. 4. Simultaneous auscultatory and intra-arterial pressures should be taken in the same arm when assessing any discrepancy. In addition, auscultatory and palpatory, brachial and forearm pressures should be compared with an intra-arterial reading. Measurements of brachial and radial blood flow in the forearm would be useful in seeking to explain a discrepancy between measurement methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022346107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022346107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3852812

AN - SCOPUS:0022346107

VL - 14

SP - 223

EP - 227

JO - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

JF - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

SN - 0147-9563

IS - 3

ER -