A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values.

J. S. Prawat, L. Nieberg, George Cisneros, G. Acs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cephalometric radiography has become a standard and invaluable means of obtaining diagnostic information for the management of malocclusion and skeletal disharmony. However, concerns over radiographic exposure, particularly in growing individuals, may limit its use, especially in longitudinal analyses. Less invasive means of obtaining vital information would be desirable. A recently introduced system (Digigraph, Dolphin Imaging Systems; Valencia, Calif) provides sonically produced representations of cranial landmarks and has been introduced by its manufacturer as an alternative to standard cephalometric radiography. The purpose of the study was to compare the validity and reproducibility of cephalometric values generated sonically on a digital image analyzer (Digigraph) with those obtained from standard cephalometric radiographs for 43 different measurements. Although 58.1% of the sonically produced measurements showed significant correlation with radiographically produced measurements, there were no trends observed for correlation, either in dental or skeletal structure classifications. Additionally, this study found the data generated from the digital image analyzer to be markedly variable, while the radiographically obtained data were reproducible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-276
Number of pages6
JournalAngle Orthodontist
Volume65
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Cephalometry
Radiography
Dolphins
Information Management
Malocclusion
Tooth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values. / Prawat, J. S.; Nieberg, L.; Cisneros, George; Acs, G.

In: Angle Orthodontist, Vol. 65, No. 4, 1995, p. 271-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prawat, J. S. ; Nieberg, L. ; Cisneros, George ; Acs, G. / A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values. In: Angle Orthodontist. 1995 ; Vol. 65, No. 4. pp. 271-276.
@article{f54b3ee48d0a404d9531c97756eeeccf,
title = "A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values.",
abstract = "Cephalometric radiography has become a standard and invaluable means of obtaining diagnostic information for the management of malocclusion and skeletal disharmony. However, concerns over radiographic exposure, particularly in growing individuals, may limit its use, especially in longitudinal analyses. Less invasive means of obtaining vital information would be desirable. A recently introduced system (Digigraph, Dolphin Imaging Systems; Valencia, Calif) provides sonically produced representations of cranial landmarks and has been introduced by its manufacturer as an alternative to standard cephalometric radiography. The purpose of the study was to compare the validity and reproducibility of cephalometric values generated sonically on a digital image analyzer (Digigraph) with those obtained from standard cephalometric radiographs for 43 different measurements. Although 58.1{\%} of the sonically produced measurements showed significant correlation with radiographically produced measurements, there were no trends observed for correlation, either in dental or skeletal structure classifications. Additionally, this study found the data generated from the digital image analyzer to be markedly variable, while the radiographically obtained data were reproducible.",
author = "Prawat, {J. S.} and L. Nieberg and George Cisneros and G. Acs",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "271--276",
journal = "Angle Orthodontist",
issn = "0003-3219",
publisher = "E H Angle Orthodontists Research & Education Foundation, Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values.

AU - Prawat, J. S.

AU - Nieberg, L.

AU - Cisneros, George

AU - Acs, G.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Cephalometric radiography has become a standard and invaluable means of obtaining diagnostic information for the management of malocclusion and skeletal disharmony. However, concerns over radiographic exposure, particularly in growing individuals, may limit its use, especially in longitudinal analyses. Less invasive means of obtaining vital information would be desirable. A recently introduced system (Digigraph, Dolphin Imaging Systems; Valencia, Calif) provides sonically produced representations of cranial landmarks and has been introduced by its manufacturer as an alternative to standard cephalometric radiography. The purpose of the study was to compare the validity and reproducibility of cephalometric values generated sonically on a digital image analyzer (Digigraph) with those obtained from standard cephalometric radiographs for 43 different measurements. Although 58.1% of the sonically produced measurements showed significant correlation with radiographically produced measurements, there were no trends observed for correlation, either in dental or skeletal structure classifications. Additionally, this study found the data generated from the digital image analyzer to be markedly variable, while the radiographically obtained data were reproducible.

AB - Cephalometric radiography has become a standard and invaluable means of obtaining diagnostic information for the management of malocclusion and skeletal disharmony. However, concerns over radiographic exposure, particularly in growing individuals, may limit its use, especially in longitudinal analyses. Less invasive means of obtaining vital information would be desirable. A recently introduced system (Digigraph, Dolphin Imaging Systems; Valencia, Calif) provides sonically produced representations of cranial landmarks and has been introduced by its manufacturer as an alternative to standard cephalometric radiography. The purpose of the study was to compare the validity and reproducibility of cephalometric values generated sonically on a digital image analyzer (Digigraph) with those obtained from standard cephalometric radiographs for 43 different measurements. Although 58.1% of the sonically produced measurements showed significant correlation with radiographically produced measurements, there were no trends observed for correlation, either in dental or skeletal structure classifications. Additionally, this study found the data generated from the digital image analyzer to be markedly variable, while the radiographically obtained data were reproducible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029175615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029175615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7486241

AN - SCOPUS:0029175615

VL - 65

SP - 271

EP - 276

JO - Angle Orthodontist

JF - Angle Orthodontist

SN - 0003-3219

IS - 4

ER -