A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence

Ronald Van Den Berg, Kavitha Anandalingam, Ariel Zylberberg, Roozbeh Kiani, Michael N. Shadlen, Daniel M. Wolpert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Decisions are accompanied by a degree of confidence that a selected option is correct. A sequential sampling framework explains the speed and accuracy of decisions and extends naturally to the confidence that the decision rendered is likely to be correct. However, discrepancies between confidence and accuracy suggest that confidence might be supported by mechanisms dissociated from the decision process. Here we show that this discrepancy can arise naturally because of simple processing delays. When participants were asked to report choice and confidence simultaneously, their confidence, reaction time and a perceptual decision about motion were explained by bounded evidence accumulation. However, we also observed revisions of the initial choice and/or confidence. These changes of mind were explained by a continuation of the mechanism that led to the initial choice. Our findings extend the sequential sampling framework to vacillation about confidence and invites caution in interpreting dissociations between confidence and accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere12192
JournaleLife
Volume5
Issue numberFEBRUARY2016
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Sampling
Processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Van Den Berg, R., Anandalingam, K., Zylberberg, A., Kiani, R., Shadlen, M. N., & Wolpert, D. M. (2016). A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence. eLife, 5(FEBRUARY2016), [e12192]. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12192

A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence. / Van Den Berg, Ronald; Anandalingam, Kavitha; Zylberberg, Ariel; Kiani, Roozbeh; Shadlen, Michael N.; Wolpert, Daniel M.

In: eLife, Vol. 5, No. FEBRUARY2016, e12192, 01.02.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Den Berg, R, Anandalingam, K, Zylberberg, A, Kiani, R, Shadlen, MN & Wolpert, DM 2016, 'A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence', eLife, vol. 5, no. FEBRUARY2016, e12192. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12192
Van Den Berg R, Anandalingam K, Zylberberg A, Kiani R, Shadlen MN, Wolpert DM. A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence. eLife. 2016 Feb 1;5(FEBRUARY2016). e12192. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12192
Van Den Berg, Ronald ; Anandalingam, Kavitha ; Zylberberg, Ariel ; Kiani, Roozbeh ; Shadlen, Michael N. ; Wolpert, Daniel M. / A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence. In: eLife. 2016 ; Vol. 5, No. FEBRUARY2016.
@article{22fe3f33a9244806b4e47554476ca6f2,
title = "A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence",
abstract = "Decisions are accompanied by a degree of confidence that a selected option is correct. A sequential sampling framework explains the speed and accuracy of decisions and extends naturally to the confidence that the decision rendered is likely to be correct. However, discrepancies between confidence and accuracy suggest that confidence might be supported by mechanisms dissociated from the decision process. Here we show that this discrepancy can arise naturally because of simple processing delays. When participants were asked to report choice and confidence simultaneously, their confidence, reaction time and a perceptual decision about motion were explained by bounded evidence accumulation. However, we also observed revisions of the initial choice and/or confidence. These changes of mind were explained by a continuation of the mechanism that led to the initial choice. Our findings extend the sequential sampling framework to vacillation about confidence and invites caution in interpreting dissociations between confidence and accuracy.",
author = "{Van Den Berg}, Ronald and Kavitha Anandalingam and Ariel Zylberberg and Roozbeh Kiani and Shadlen, {Michael N.} and Wolpert, {Daniel M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7554/eLife.12192",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "eLife",
issn = "2050-084X",
publisher = "eLife Sciences Publications",
number = "FEBRUARY2016",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence

AU - Van Den Berg, Ronald

AU - Anandalingam, Kavitha

AU - Zylberberg, Ariel

AU - Kiani, Roozbeh

AU - Shadlen, Michael N.

AU - Wolpert, Daniel M.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Decisions are accompanied by a degree of confidence that a selected option is correct. A sequential sampling framework explains the speed and accuracy of decisions and extends naturally to the confidence that the decision rendered is likely to be correct. However, discrepancies between confidence and accuracy suggest that confidence might be supported by mechanisms dissociated from the decision process. Here we show that this discrepancy can arise naturally because of simple processing delays. When participants were asked to report choice and confidence simultaneously, their confidence, reaction time and a perceptual decision about motion were explained by bounded evidence accumulation. However, we also observed revisions of the initial choice and/or confidence. These changes of mind were explained by a continuation of the mechanism that led to the initial choice. Our findings extend the sequential sampling framework to vacillation about confidence and invites caution in interpreting dissociations between confidence and accuracy.

AB - Decisions are accompanied by a degree of confidence that a selected option is correct. A sequential sampling framework explains the speed and accuracy of decisions and extends naturally to the confidence that the decision rendered is likely to be correct. However, discrepancies between confidence and accuracy suggest that confidence might be supported by mechanisms dissociated from the decision process. Here we show that this discrepancy can arise naturally because of simple processing delays. When participants were asked to report choice and confidence simultaneously, their confidence, reaction time and a perceptual decision about motion were explained by bounded evidence accumulation. However, we also observed revisions of the initial choice and/or confidence. These changes of mind were explained by a continuation of the mechanism that led to the initial choice. Our findings extend the sequential sampling framework to vacillation about confidence and invites caution in interpreting dissociations between confidence and accuracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961276021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961276021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7554/eLife.12192

DO - 10.7554/eLife.12192

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - eLife

JF - eLife

SN - 2050-084X

IS - FEBRUARY2016

M1 - e12192

ER -