A cautionary note on the use of two-stage least squares

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A computational error in the application of multiple regression computer programs to two-stage least squares estimation of the standardized coefficients for nonrecursive models leads to the understatement of the relative size of reciprocal effects. Furthermore, an error in the computation of the disturbance variance invalidates significance tests for the metric coefficients. The sources of the errors are derived and an example is presented. The example reveals that not only do the incorrectly computed standardized coefficients underestimate reciprocal effects, they also may lead to specious conclusions regarding group differences in the relative impact of causal variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-346
Number of pages12
JournalSociological Methods & Research
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1977

Fingerprint

significance test
data processing program
regression
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

A cautionary note on the use of two-stage least squares. / Hout, Michael.

In: Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1977, p. 335-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dc3da8d9ad6e4ae28a7b488437784719,
title = "A cautionary note on the use of two-stage least squares",
abstract = "A computational error in the application of multiple regression computer programs to two-stage least squares estimation of the standardized coefficients for nonrecursive models leads to the understatement of the relative size of reciprocal effects. Furthermore, an error in the computation of the disturbance variance invalidates significance tests for the metric coefficients. The sources of the errors are derived and an example is presented. The example reveals that not only do the incorrectly computed standardized coefficients underestimate reciprocal effects, they also may lead to specious conclusions regarding group differences in the relative impact of causal variables.",
author = "Michael Hout",
year = "1977",
doi = "10.1177/004912417700500304",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "335--346",
journal = "Sociological Methods and Research",
issn = "0049-1241",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cautionary note on the use of two-stage least squares

AU - Hout, Michael

PY - 1977

Y1 - 1977

N2 - A computational error in the application of multiple regression computer programs to two-stage least squares estimation of the standardized coefficients for nonrecursive models leads to the understatement of the relative size of reciprocal effects. Furthermore, an error in the computation of the disturbance variance invalidates significance tests for the metric coefficients. The sources of the errors are derived and an example is presented. The example reveals that not only do the incorrectly computed standardized coefficients underestimate reciprocal effects, they also may lead to specious conclusions regarding group differences in the relative impact of causal variables.

AB - A computational error in the application of multiple regression computer programs to two-stage least squares estimation of the standardized coefficients for nonrecursive models leads to the understatement of the relative size of reciprocal effects. Furthermore, an error in the computation of the disturbance variance invalidates significance tests for the metric coefficients. The sources of the errors are derived and an example is presented. The example reveals that not only do the incorrectly computed standardized coefficients underestimate reciprocal effects, they also may lead to specious conclusions regarding group differences in the relative impact of causal variables.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970473537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970473537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/004912417700500304

DO - 10.1177/004912417700500304

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 335

EP - 346

JO - Sociological Methods and Research

JF - Sociological Methods and Research

SN - 0049-1241

IS - 3

ER -