A Bayesian model of conditioned perception

Alan A. Stocker, Eero Simoncelli

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

We argue that in many circumstances, human observers evaluate sensory evidence simultaneously under multiple hypotheses regarding the physical process that has generated the sensory information. In such situations, inference can be optimal if an observer combines the evaluation results under each hypothesis according to the probability that the associated hypothesis is correct. However, a number of experimental results reveal suboptimal behavior and may be explained by assuming that once an observer has committed to a particular hypothesis, subsequent evaluation is based on that hypothesis alone. That is, observers sacrifice optimality in order to ensure self-consistency. We formulate this behavior using a conditional Bayesian observer model, and demonstrate that it can account for psychophysical data from a recently reported perceptual experiment in which strong biases in perceptual estimates arise as a consequence of a preceding decision. Not only does the model provide quantitative predictions of subjective responses in variants of the original experiment, but it also appears to be consistent with human responses to cognitive dissonance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference
StatePublished - 2009
Event21st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS 2007 - Vancouver, BC, Canada
Duration: Dec 3 2007Dec 6 2007

Other

Other21st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS 2007
CountryCanada
CityVancouver, BC
Period12/3/0712/6/07

Fingerprint

Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems

Cite this

Stocker, A. A., & Simoncelli, E. (2009). A Bayesian model of conditioned perception. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference

A Bayesian model of conditioned perception. / Stocker, Alan A.; Simoncelli, Eero.

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference. 2009.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Stocker, AA & Simoncelli, E 2009, A Bayesian model of conditioned perception. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference. 21st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 12/3/07.
Stocker AA, Simoncelli E. A Bayesian model of conditioned perception. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference. 2009
Stocker, Alan A. ; Simoncelli, Eero. / A Bayesian model of conditioned perception. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference. 2009.
@inproceedings{ac7742fe8a9946219c233fea73a3dafe,
title = "A Bayesian model of conditioned perception",
abstract = "We argue that in many circumstances, human observers evaluate sensory evidence simultaneously under multiple hypotheses regarding the physical process that has generated the sensory information. In such situations, inference can be optimal if an observer combines the evaluation results under each hypothesis according to the probability that the associated hypothesis is correct. However, a number of experimental results reveal suboptimal behavior and may be explained by assuming that once an observer has committed to a particular hypothesis, subsequent evaluation is based on that hypothesis alone. That is, observers sacrifice optimality in order to ensure self-consistency. We formulate this behavior using a conditional Bayesian observer model, and demonstrate that it can account for psychophysical data from a recently reported perceptual experiment in which strong biases in perceptual estimates arise as a consequence of a preceding decision. Not only does the model provide quantitative predictions of subjective responses in variants of the original experiment, but it also appears to be consistent with human responses to cognitive dissonance.",
author = "Stocker, {Alan A.} and Eero Simoncelli",
year = "2009",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "160560352X",
booktitle = "Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A Bayesian model of conditioned perception

AU - Stocker, Alan A.

AU - Simoncelli, Eero

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - We argue that in many circumstances, human observers evaluate sensory evidence simultaneously under multiple hypotheses regarding the physical process that has generated the sensory information. In such situations, inference can be optimal if an observer combines the evaluation results under each hypothesis according to the probability that the associated hypothesis is correct. However, a number of experimental results reveal suboptimal behavior and may be explained by assuming that once an observer has committed to a particular hypothesis, subsequent evaluation is based on that hypothesis alone. That is, observers sacrifice optimality in order to ensure self-consistency. We formulate this behavior using a conditional Bayesian observer model, and demonstrate that it can account for psychophysical data from a recently reported perceptual experiment in which strong biases in perceptual estimates arise as a consequence of a preceding decision. Not only does the model provide quantitative predictions of subjective responses in variants of the original experiment, but it also appears to be consistent with human responses to cognitive dissonance.

AB - We argue that in many circumstances, human observers evaluate sensory evidence simultaneously under multiple hypotheses regarding the physical process that has generated the sensory information. In such situations, inference can be optimal if an observer combines the evaluation results under each hypothesis according to the probability that the associated hypothesis is correct. However, a number of experimental results reveal suboptimal behavior and may be explained by assuming that once an observer has committed to a particular hypothesis, subsequent evaluation is based on that hypothesis alone. That is, observers sacrifice optimality in order to ensure self-consistency. We formulate this behavior using a conditional Bayesian observer model, and demonstrate that it can account for psychophysical data from a recently reported perceptual experiment in which strong biases in perceptual estimates arise as a consequence of a preceding decision. Not only does the model provide quantitative predictions of subjective responses in variants of the original experiment, but it also appears to be consistent with human responses to cognitive dissonance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858790812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858790812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 160560352X

SN - 9781605603520

BT - Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference

ER -