12-Year Use of a Digital Reference Library (VitalBook) at a U.S. Dental School: Students' and Alumni Perceptions

Andrew Spielman, Elizabeth Maas, Elise S. Eisenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Digital textbooks are being used to reduce production and storage costs of printed copies, enhance usage, and include search capabilities, but the use of digital texts is not universally accepted. In 2001, the New York University College of Dentistry introduced a digital reference library, the VitalBook. Beginning in 2005, the college annually surveyed senior students and, from 2012, also surveyed alumni on their opinions and extent of use of the VitalBook. The aim of this study was to evaluate 12 years of students' perspectives and three years of alumni perspectives on the value of the VitalBook to their dental educational experience. Students were asked how frequently they used the VitalBook, if it was a good investment, if they would use it after graduation, and if they would recommend it to others. Alumni were asked the last three questions. This study reports the results from 4,105 students over 12 years (average response rate 95.3%) and 184 alumni over three years (average response rate 17.4%). The results indicated that students used the VitalBook on average 24% of their study time, but they were split regarding the other questions. The majority opinion in 2005 was negative on all questions. These opinions shifted to become more favorable to a peak in 2010, but declined since then to a more negative overall view of the VitalBook. A split opinion among students continued through 2016, with fewer recommending it although more considered it a good investment with plans to use it after graduation. Alumni mirrored their responses as students. These results suggest that, as more flexible and dynamic digitized reference systems emerge, the use of student-paid traditional digitized textbooks may become an even less favored choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1243-1251
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Dental Education
Volume81
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Digital Libraries
Dental Students
Dental Schools
alumni
Students
school
student
Textbooks
textbook
dentistry
Dentistry
Tooth
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • dental education
  • digital library
  • e-book
  • e-reference
  • e-text
  • educational materials
  • electronic books
  • textbooks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

12-Year Use of a Digital Reference Library (VitalBook) at a U.S. Dental School : Students' and Alumni Perceptions. / Spielman, Andrew; Maas, Elizabeth; Eisenberg, Elise S.

In: Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 81, No. 10, 01.10.2017, p. 1243-1251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{926555261bb44716924176f0c6157748,
title = "12-Year Use of a Digital Reference Library (VitalBook) at a U.S. Dental School: Students' and Alumni Perceptions",
abstract = "Digital textbooks are being used to reduce production and storage costs of printed copies, enhance usage, and include search capabilities, but the use of digital texts is not universally accepted. In 2001, the New York University College of Dentistry introduced a digital reference library, the VitalBook. Beginning in 2005, the college annually surveyed senior students and, from 2012, also surveyed alumni on their opinions and extent of use of the VitalBook. The aim of this study was to evaluate 12 years of students' perspectives and three years of alumni perspectives on the value of the VitalBook to their dental educational experience. Students were asked how frequently they used the VitalBook, if it was a good investment, if they would use it after graduation, and if they would recommend it to others. Alumni were asked the last three questions. This study reports the results from 4,105 students over 12 years (average response rate 95.3{\%}) and 184 alumni over three years (average response rate 17.4{\%}). The results indicated that students used the VitalBook on average 24{\%} of their study time, but they were split regarding the other questions. The majority opinion in 2005 was negative on all questions. These opinions shifted to become more favorable to a peak in 2010, but declined since then to a more negative overall view of the VitalBook. A split opinion among students continued through 2016, with fewer recommending it although more considered it a good investment with plans to use it after graduation. Alumni mirrored their responses as students. These results suggest that, as more flexible and dynamic digitized reference systems emerge, the use of student-paid traditional digitized textbooks may become an even less favored choice.",
keywords = "dental education, digital library, e-book, e-reference, e-text, educational materials, electronic books, textbooks",
author = "Andrew Spielman and Elizabeth Maas and Eisenberg, {Elise S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.21815/JDE.017.082",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "1243--1251",
journal = "Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "0022-0337",
publisher = "American Dental Education Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 12-Year Use of a Digital Reference Library (VitalBook) at a U.S. Dental School

T2 - Students' and Alumni Perceptions

AU - Spielman, Andrew

AU - Maas, Elizabeth

AU - Eisenberg, Elise S.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Digital textbooks are being used to reduce production and storage costs of printed copies, enhance usage, and include search capabilities, but the use of digital texts is not universally accepted. In 2001, the New York University College of Dentistry introduced a digital reference library, the VitalBook. Beginning in 2005, the college annually surveyed senior students and, from 2012, also surveyed alumni on their opinions and extent of use of the VitalBook. The aim of this study was to evaluate 12 years of students' perspectives and three years of alumni perspectives on the value of the VitalBook to their dental educational experience. Students were asked how frequently they used the VitalBook, if it was a good investment, if they would use it after graduation, and if they would recommend it to others. Alumni were asked the last three questions. This study reports the results from 4,105 students over 12 years (average response rate 95.3%) and 184 alumni over three years (average response rate 17.4%). The results indicated that students used the VitalBook on average 24% of their study time, but they were split regarding the other questions. The majority opinion in 2005 was negative on all questions. These opinions shifted to become more favorable to a peak in 2010, but declined since then to a more negative overall view of the VitalBook. A split opinion among students continued through 2016, with fewer recommending it although more considered it a good investment with plans to use it after graduation. Alumni mirrored their responses as students. These results suggest that, as more flexible and dynamic digitized reference systems emerge, the use of student-paid traditional digitized textbooks may become an even less favored choice.

AB - Digital textbooks are being used to reduce production and storage costs of printed copies, enhance usage, and include search capabilities, but the use of digital texts is not universally accepted. In 2001, the New York University College of Dentistry introduced a digital reference library, the VitalBook. Beginning in 2005, the college annually surveyed senior students and, from 2012, also surveyed alumni on their opinions and extent of use of the VitalBook. The aim of this study was to evaluate 12 years of students' perspectives and three years of alumni perspectives on the value of the VitalBook to their dental educational experience. Students were asked how frequently they used the VitalBook, if it was a good investment, if they would use it after graduation, and if they would recommend it to others. Alumni were asked the last three questions. This study reports the results from 4,105 students over 12 years (average response rate 95.3%) and 184 alumni over three years (average response rate 17.4%). The results indicated that students used the VitalBook on average 24% of their study time, but they were split regarding the other questions. The majority opinion in 2005 was negative on all questions. These opinions shifted to become more favorable to a peak in 2010, but declined since then to a more negative overall view of the VitalBook. A split opinion among students continued through 2016, with fewer recommending it although more considered it a good investment with plans to use it after graduation. Alumni mirrored their responses as students. These results suggest that, as more flexible and dynamic digitized reference systems emerge, the use of student-paid traditional digitized textbooks may become an even less favored choice.

KW - dental education

KW - digital library

KW - e-book

KW - e-reference

KW - e-text

KW - educational materials

KW - electronic books

KW - textbooks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031045169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031045169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21815/JDE.017.082

DO - 10.21815/JDE.017.082

M3 - Article

C2 - 28966190

AN - SCOPUS:85031045169

VL - 81

SP - 1243

EP - 1251

JO - Journal of Dental Education

JF - Journal of Dental Education

SN - 0022-0337

IS - 10

ER -